How to Avoid Missing Emails During the Holiday Inbox Overflow

The Importance of Email in Retail Marketing

As the holiday season approaches, retailers are focusing heavily on email campaigns as a key part of their marketing strategy. However, despite careful planning and well-crafted messages, 31% of consumers delete emails within seconds, often based on the subject line alone, according to data from Validity. This issue is especially common among Millennials and Gen Z, who are more likely to quickly scan and discard emails.

The rise in email volume has contributed to this challenge. Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, global email traffic for legitimate, permission-based messages has doubled. Brands poured significant resources into digital channels during the pandemic, but even as the situation eased, the volume of emails remained high. This saturation makes it harder for individual messages to stand out.

While younger generations are often seen as moving away from email, the reality is more nuanced. According to Guy Hanson, VP of customer engagement at Validity, younger people still engage with email, though they tend to do so less frequently than older demographics. Factors such as education, income, and personal preferences play a role in how different age groups interact with various communication channels.

Changing Preferences and Channel Dynamics

Despite the continued relevance of email, some trends indicate that it's not as dominant as it once was. Sophie Cheng, SVP of product marketing at Sinch, noted that consumer preference for email has decreased by 5.5% this year, while WhatsApp usage has increased by 5.1%. This shift reflects the tendency of younger generations to adopt new technologies and evolve their communication habits.

However, it’s not just about channel preference. Research also shows that the demand for multichannel experiences is down nearly 7%, and one in six consumers finds personalized messages invasive. Complaints about overly personal content have risen by 43% compared to last year. Yet, despite these concerns, 73% of consumers still want tailored promotions, although this number has dropped by 7.1% from 2024.

The Shift Toward Optimal Channel Engagement

With so many options available for brand engagement—email, SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, social media, third-party apps like Amazon, and mobile apps—marketers face a complex challenge. Consumers now expect consistency across channels and the ability to choose how they interact with brands.

Sophie Cheng emphasized that what consumers truly want is control. They prefer to decide which channels brands use to reach them, and many companies are still behind in offering this flexibility. Additionally, customers expect seamless transitions between channels, such as maintaining context from an SMS conversation to a phone call.

Cheng advises marketers to think in terms of "optimal channel" rather than "omnichannel." This means selecting the most effective communication method for each interaction instead of trying to be present on every platform.

The Evolving Role of Email in Branding

Although new channels continue to emerge, email remains a powerful tool for brand building. According to Validity’s Hanson, email is often undervalued as a way to keep brands top of mind. When done well, it allows brands to speak directly to consumers in their own voice.

Measuring brand impact through email can be challenging, but there are ways to track success. Marketers can look at metrics such as spikes in website traffic, increases in search volume, or changes in sales on platforms like Amazon.

Strategies for Improving Email Performance During the Holidays

During the busy holiday season, especially around Black Friday and Cyber Monday, competition for consumer attention is fierce. To improve deliverability and inbox placement, experts recommend scheduling bulk emails outside of peak times, such as 15 minutes past the hour or 10 minutes before the hour.

When crafting subject lines, Hanson suggests avoiding overly clever language and instead front-loading offers for maximum visibility. Using emojis at the beginning of subject lines can help capture attention and prevent truncation. Personalization based on interests, such as "Golfers like you," can also boost engagement.

While AI tools can assist with generating subject lines, Hanson warns against relying solely on automation. He recommends using AI for initial ideas and then applying a human touch to refine the message. AI may suggest urgent or clickbait-style language, which can harm a brand’s tone. Instead, marketers should focus on brand-centric language that resonates with their audience.

In summary, while the digital landscape continues to evolve, email remains a critical component of retail marketing. By adapting strategies and focusing on the right messaging, brands can ensure their emails stand out in a crowded inbox.

Why Android Users Need Open Source Apps

The Hidden Costs of the Modern App Ecosystem

In today's digital world, the app ecosystem operates on a system that is often unspoken and unfair. Users are offered a vast selection of free applications in exchange for their personal data and attention. This model extracts maximum value from users, treating them as the product rather than the customer. Two common experiences highlight this issue.

First, many apps request access to more data than necessary. For example, an app designed for a single purpose may ask for access to contacts, precise location, and even the microphone. This overreach collects data far beyond what is needed for the app's core functionality.

The second issue involves a bait-and-switch monetization strategy. A user might download a free app, only to find that a mandatory update transforms it into a subscription-based service, locking previous features behind a recurring paywall.

What Makes Open Source Different?

To understand the differences, it's important to clarify what open source means. It is a simple yet powerful concept. Proprietary software, which is commonly found in many Google Play apps, works like a secret restaurant recipe. You can buy the food, but you don't know what's in it, how it's made, or whether it's good for you. You have to trust the company.

Open source software is more like a community cookbook. The recipe (source code) is public. You can read every ingredient, check the process, and verify its safety. You can suggest improvements, share the recipe, or tweak it to create your own version.

Open Source Apps Don’t Exploit Your Data

We live in an era of constant data scandals. In 2025, researchers discovered that the official Facebook and Instagram apps used a hidden Android loophole to track users' web browsing, even in private mode. They called it "Local Mess," reminding users that they can't always know what happens behind the scenes with closed-source apps.

Another example is the Flo health tracking app, which promised to keep health data private. Investigations revealed that the company shared sensitive details with Facebook and Google Analytics without user consent. Open source software makes this kind of undisclosed data collection less likely because anyone can inspect what the app does.

This transparency deters spyware and backdoors. Security experts and hobbyists worldwide review open source code, leading to faster identification and fixing of vulnerabilities. Attempts to slip in malicious code to collect your data are likely to be caught by the community.

Focus on User Experience Over Profits

Many freemium apps are hard to use due to constant pop-ups for subscription upgrades. This is uncommon with FOSS. Most open source apps have no ads, third-party trackers, or dark patterns. The FOSS ethos is to remove bloat and annoyances, making users feel better. These apps don't serve ad networks or push upsells.

Furthermore, open source developers respond to community feedback. You can reach them directly on GitHub, Matrix, Discord, and forums, and they listen. If you request a feature or report a bug, there's a good chance it will be addressed in an update. If you're technical, you can contribute to fixing it yourself.

Design and Polish Gap Narrowing

The design and polish gap between open source and commercial apps has narrowed in recent years. Signal, a secure messaging app used by tens of millions, and VLC media player show that open source apps can be as user-friendly as commercial software.

Freedom from Subscription Lock-Ins

How often have you used an app only to see the developer raise prices or move features behind a subscription? It’s common in today's app economy. Open source apps offer a way out. Core features remain free, with no bait and switch. If you donate to support development, it's by choice, not coercion.

That frees you from worrying about budgets and billing cycles for essential apps. Take AntennaPod, a free, open source podcast player known for its simple, usable design. Unlike many commercial podcast apps, it doesn't require an account or push premium plans. Install it and start listening to your favorite podcasts.

Respecting Device Resources

Proprietary apps drain your battery or hog storage despite simple functions. They're often bloated with ad and analytics libraries and other unrelated background processes. Open source apps are usually leaner and more efficient. Without ads, constant tracking pings, or unnecessary permissions, FOSS apps conserve device resources and data.

This saves battery, storage, and RAM daily, and you don't need to constantly clear your phone's cache. App size and speed are other benefits. Open source alternatives require fewer downloads and use less storage. Moreover, lightweight FOSS apps can extend your phone's usable life on older devices.

Real Ownership of Your Data

A common worry with proprietary services is what happens if they shut things down. We've seen it happen. A company decides an app isn't profitable or wants to push users elsewhere, and the service is discontinued. When the Inbox shut down, Google told users to switch back to Gmail. Community pleas didn't matter because the app was Google's property, not the users.

Open source apps flip that dynamic. You have control over the app and your data. If a developer stops maintaining a project, the source code remains available, so others can pick it up or fork it. Even games can live on in the open source world as communities maintain them.

Easy Access to Open Source Apps

Finding and using open source apps has become easier than ever. Open source isn't perfect, but its rough edges are fading fast. Today, many open source apps look and feel indistinguishable from their proprietary counterparts. For instance, the WordPress blogging app and Bitwarden, a top-rated password manager, are open source and have millions of non-technical users.

Finding and installing them is also easier than you may think. Many FOSS apps are on Google Play, and they update automatically through Play, with no special steps. The community has F-Droid for apps that aren't on the Play Store (often due to philosophical reasons or Play Store policies).

Pixel 10 Battery Degrades After 200 Cycles, Unavoidable Feature Impact

Understanding the Battery Health Assistance Feature in Pixel 10

Google has introduced a new feature called Battery Health Assistance in its latest Pixel 10 lineup, and it is enabled by default. This means that users cannot disable the feature, which could be a point of concern for some. The feature is designed to slow down battery wear by adjusting charging speed and voltage, aiming to maintain consistent performance as the battery ages.

How It Works

Battery Health Assistance starts to take effect after 200 charge cycles. At this point, the device begins to lower the battery voltage in stages, continuing until it reaches 1,000 cycles. This gradual adjustment is intended to help the battery age more evenly and maintain stable performance over time. However, this process can lead to slower charging and a reduction in usable battery capacity as the device accumulates more charge cycles.

Impact on User Experience

The lowering of voltage affects the battery's usable capacity, resulting in shorter battery life and longer charging times. Google has not provided specific details on how much capacity is lost after 200 charge cycles. While the company claims that Pixel batteries should maintain 80% of their original capacity after 1,000 charge cycles, the always-on Battery Health Assistance feature adds an additional layer of capacity loss. This means that every Pixel 10 will experience a gradual decrease in usable battery beyond normal aging.

Comparison with Other Brands

In comparison to other smartphone manufacturers, Google's approach seems more restrictive. For instance, Samsung’s flagship phones are rated to keep 80% battery capacity after around 2,000 charge cycles, which is significantly higher than Google's 1,000 cycles. This difference in cycle ratings highlights the varying approaches taken by different companies to manage battery health.

Possible Reasons Behind the Decision

Google's decision to make Battery Health Assistance mandatory may be a precautionary measure, especially considering past issues such as the overheating problems experienced with the Pixel 6a. By setting the feature to kick in at 200 cycles, Google aims to avoid similar issues and protect the brand's reputation. However, this approach may feel restrictive to users who prefer having more control over their device's settings.

User Control and Preferences

Unlike Google, many other phone manufacturers allow users to manage battery settings themselves. This flexibility enables users to choose between optimal performance and extended battery life based on their preferences. The lack of user control in the Pixel 10 lineup could be a drawback for those who value customization and personalization.

Conclusion

While Battery Health Assistance is designed to prolong the lifespan of the Pixel 10's battery, it comes with trade-offs that affect user experience. The feature's mandatory nature and the impact on charging speed and battery capacity are significant considerations for potential buyers. As the smartphone market continues to evolve, it remains to be seen how Google's approach will be received by consumers and whether it will influence future design choices in the industry.

Trump Supports Intel to Expand High-Tech Chip Manufacturing in America

The Semiconductor Landscape and Intel's Role

In the world of semiconductors, Intel has long held a dominant position. Its chips are integral to desktop computers, laptops, and servers that power businesses and homes globally. However, as the tech industry evolves, particularly with the rise of mobile computing, Intel’s influence has waned. Companies like Qualcomm have taken the lead in this space, leveraging advanced technologies tailored for mobile devices.

Despite this shift, the Trump administration has shown a strong interest in supporting Intel. A recent report suggests that the government is considering ways to assist the company in producing advanced chips within the United States. This move aligns with broader efforts to bring manufacturing back to American soil, especially in high-tech industries where global competition is fierce.

Government Support and Strategic Interest

Unlike Qualcomm, which relies on external foundries like TSMC for chip production, Intel possesses its own fabrication facilities. This unique position makes it a key player in the U.S. semiconductor ecosystem. According to the report, the government’s interest in Intel goes beyond mere financial stakes. It also aims to strengthen the company’s cutting-edge processes, such as the 18A technology, which represents the next frontier in chip manufacturing.

Intel has made it clear that significant government incentives would be necessary for it to remain competitive against industry leaders like TSMC. This development marks a notable shift in the administration’s approach, highlighting a strategic investment in domestic semiconductor capabilities.

A Shift in Tone and Public Statements

The relationship between Trump and Intel’s CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, has seen some fluctuations. Just days before, Trump publicly criticized Tan, suggesting he should be fired. However, the tone quickly changed, with Trump praising the CEO shortly after. This change in stance underscores the importance of Intel in the administration’s broader economic strategy.

Tariffs and Their Implications

In addition to supporting Intel, Trump has announced plans to impose a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors. This move is part of an effort to encourage both domestic and foreign companies to establish more manufacturing operations in the U.S. Major players like Samsung and TSMC have responded by increasing their investments in American facilities.

However, the impact of these tariffs is not without challenges. While they may help companies avoid import duties, the cost of labor and manufacturing in the U.S. can be significantly higher compared to countries like Taiwan and China. This could lead to increased production costs, potentially offsetting the benefits of avoiding tariffs.

The Broader Implications

The push to bolster domestic semiconductor production reflects a larger trend in U.S. economic policy. As global supply chains become increasingly complex, ensuring national security and technological leadership is a top priority. By supporting companies like Intel, the administration aims to reduce reliance on foreign manufacturing and strengthen the domestic tech sector.

This initiative also highlights the importance of innovation and investment in advanced technologies. With the demand for semiconductors growing across various industries, from consumer electronics to artificial intelligence, the need for a robust domestic supply chain is more critical than ever.

Conclusion

The support for Intel and the imposition of tariffs on imported semiconductors signal a strategic shift in how the U.S. approaches its semiconductor industry. While there are challenges to overcome, the potential benefits of a stronger domestic manufacturing base could be substantial. As the landscape continues to evolve, the role of companies like Intel will be crucial in shaping the future of technology in the United States.

I pitted two top controllers against each other—only one standout feature decided the winner

Design and Features

The Huben 2 made a great first impression before I’d even seen it: its hard-shell case was sturdier and more premium than I was expecting, with its insides perfectly modeled to the contours of the controller, spare D-pad hat, and USB dongle. It also has a netted area to store the USB cable, complete with an integrated hook-and-loop fastener to keep it coiled in place.

The controller itself lives up to its high quality packaging. It looks very sleek and smart with its transparent faceplate revealing the brilliant white colorway of my review unit, which is nicely accented by the red sticks and face buttons. All of its materials look and feel premium, and the overall build quality is excellent, with the moving parts being smooth to operate yet solidly fitted. The material behind the handles is textured to offer grip, although it’s a slight shame it’s still made from a hard plastic material.

The G7 Pro has a slightly smaller form than the Huben 2, so those with smaller hands might find it preferable to hold. Build quality is similar to that of Huben 2, although it’s perhaps not quite as sharp looking or as premium. Nevertheless, it still feels very nice in the hand, and it has better grips, thanks to the soft-touch material on their undersides that provide more grip than the Huben 2’s. The texture and even the color are very similar on both pads, though.

There’s no included case for the G7 Pro, but it does come with a charging dock, which is made to a similarly high standard and fits the pad seamlessly, offering plenty of security while being easy to set and release. It’s also pleasingly slight, so it takes up minimal space.

Both controllers adopt the familiar Xbox controller style, although there are some differences in their features. The G7 Pro has a headset jack, the Huben 2 doesn’t. But the Huben 2 has four back buttons, while the G7 Pro only has two. However, the G7 Pro has a further two extra buttons nestled between the triggers and bumpers. This is a choice location for them, as they’re very easy to use – easier than using back buttons. There’s also less chance of accidentally triggering them when gripping the pad, as I often did with the Huben 2’s back buttons.

What’s more, the two back buttons of the G7 Pro have an adjacent slider to disable them, which is far more convenient than having to use its accompanying software, as is the case with the Huben 2. Speaking of which, the software for both gamepads offers plenty of customization options, beyond those accessible on-board. Both have mobile and Windows apps, although in the case of GameSir, its app for the latter system (GameSir Nexus) is far more capable than its app for the former.

The Mobapad mobile app, on the other hand, does feature plenty of tweaking potential to please serious tinkerers. As with Nexus, it allows buttons to be remapped and stick deadzones and curve profiles to be altered. Other adjustments for motion controls and Turbo functions are also possible in both Nexus and the Moboapad app, although the latter offers slightly more depth. In reality, though, you won’t find many other software that offer as many customizations as these two. Both are also easy to use, although it’s a shame the Huben 2 itself can’t be used to navigate the Mobapad app – even though it can be used to navigate your phone’s UI.

While both controllers have Bluetooth and USB dongles for multiple wireless connections, there are some differences in the platforms they support. Both work with PC and Android devices, but the Huben 2 has added iOS compatibility. And as for consoles, the G7 Pro is compatible with the Xbox Series X and Series S and the Xbox One, while the Huben 2 works with Switch.

Performance

In action, the Huben 2 really shines. The face buttons are clicky, lacking the heavily damped feel of many other controllers, but still just as tactile; they’re more akin to the clicks of the best gaming mice. They’re also very snappy and responsive as a result. Even better is the D-pad: it feels very similar to the face buttons, and is just as quick and easy to use. Rapid, multiple inputs were a cinch in Tekken 8, while maintaining high levels of accuracy. There’s a small amount of dampening in each direction, which helps to make presses more controlled.

The default hat also helped in this regard. It adopts a very similar design to that of the latest Xbox controller, with its prominent middle dip and clearly squared-off segments, which provide plenty of feedback and stability. The D-pad on the G7 Pro is, if anything, even easier and more clicky in its actuation than the Huben 2’s. However, it lacks any discernable dampening, which can result in less control over presses. I also found the hat too small and flat to provide sufficient grip, resulting in my thumb frequently falling off its left edge.

Both controllers have similar shoulder buttons, adopting the familiar shape and placement of those adorning the best Xbox controllers. I did find the bumpers of the Huben 2 a tad too high for my liking, but this is a minor gripe. Both sets of triggers offer sufficient travel and feel, although those on the G7 Pro offer more resistance and have greater dampening. You might think this would make them easier to control than the Huben 2’s, but the latter’s more rounded shape compensates for their light actuation.

This is because a larger portion of your fingers is in contact with the physical buttons, which in turn allows you to control their depression more easily, at least in my experience. They’re also more comfortable as a result of this shape, allowing me to play with the Huben 2 for longer periods without fatigue. I certainly welcomed this aspect when playing games requiring constant use of the triggers, such Assetto Corsa and titles requiring vehicle control. However, all of this isn’t to say that the triggers of the G7 Pro are poor, as they’re still perfectly enjoyable to use.

Each trigger also has its own travel lock switch next to it, allowing you to switch it from analog to digital modes, which is useful in the case of shooters where quick taps are required. Both controllers also feature motion controls. The Huben 2’s work excellently on Switch: when I aimed bows in The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild, their tracking and precision rivalled that of the best Nintendo Switch controllers. I experienced no drop outs or lag, either.

Since the G7 Pro isn’t compatible with the console, its motion controls can only be used on PC as a substitute for the sticks or even mouse inputs (something the Huben 2 is capable of, too). While they’re accurate enough, few PC games were designed with these controls in mind, so they don’t work as seamlessly. This isn’t exactly the G7 Pro’s fault, but it does beg the question as to why it has gyro capabilities if it’s not compatible with the platform that makes best use of them.

When it comes to sticks, I prefer the smoother, softer material on the Huben 2’s, as well as their deeper indentations which offer more purchase, and overall feel more satisfying to use than the G7 Pro’s. It’s not that their hall effect technology seems more accurate than the TMR sensors in the G7 Pro’s sticks, but they feel more responsive as well as being easier to wrangle, moving in precisely the way you want them to.

As for connectivity, both controllers worked with their respective devices without issue during my testing. Switching between devices is also easy, since both feature sliders on the rear for changing platforms, although it can take a few moments and press of the power button to connect to the new device.

Verdict

Both the Huben 2 and the G7 Pro are great controllers. They’re expensive – and there are plenty of great budget alternatives out there (including other models from the two brands) – but if you’re looking for something a little more upmarket, neither is likely to disappoint. However, I think the Huben 2 has the slight edge, feeling just that little more premium and satisfying to use, with the D-pad deserving special mention. A large part of your decision may come down to the specific platform support, but if you’re playing on PC, Android, or Switch – or all three – the Huben 2 is the superior choice as far as I’m concerned.

Pixel 10 Pre-Order Alert: Don't Miss Your Google One Benefits

Understanding the Google Pixel 10 Pre-Order Benefits

If you're excited about the latest releases from Google, including the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, and Pixel 10 Pro Fold, you're not alone. These new devices come with a range of appealing features that have generated a lot of interest. Additionally, the pre-order deals are quite enticing, offering users some valuable perks. However, there's an important detail that potential buyers should be aware of to avoid any unexpected issues.

What You Get with a Pixel 10 Pre-Order

Those who choose to pre-order a Pixel 10 device can enjoy several benefits. One of the main incentives is a year-long subscription to Google AI Pro, which provides access to advanced AI features and tools. In addition, customers receive 2TB of Google One storage at no extra cost. For those who already have a paid plan for these services, there is also additional compensation available. This offer can be especially beneficial if you were planning to subscribe to these services anyway.

The Catch: Canceling Your Pre-Order

Despite the attractive offers, there is a cautionary note for those who are still on the fence about making a purchase. If you place a pre-order and later decide to cancel it, you may face some significant consequences. Specifically, canceling your order could result in the loss of key pre-order benefits, such as the Google One subscription.

Impact on Your Current Google One Subscription

One of the most important points to consider is that Google’s terms and conditions state that the free trial for these services begins the moment you place your order—not when you receive the phone. This means that if you cancel your pre-order, Google may also cancel your existing Google One and Google AI Pro subscriptions.

This situation has caught some users off guard, leaving them without access to their services and requiring them to go through the hassle of re-subscribing. It's a scenario that many would prefer to avoid, especially if they rely on these services for their daily activities.

The Importance of Reading the Fine Print

This situation highlights the importance of reading the fine print before making any commitments. While Google aims to make the pre-order process as smooth as possible, the system may not account for users who change their minds after placing an order. Moreover, if you cancel your initial pre-order and then decide to pre-order again later, you might not be eligible for the same perks. This is because the offers are typically limited to one per customer.

Making an Informed Decision

Before you proceed with a pre-order, it's essential to ensure that you are fully committed to purchasing the device. The pre-order deal is a great opportunity, but it's crucial to be certain about your decision before clicking the "buy" button. Taking the time to understand the terms and conditions can help you avoid unnecessary complications down the line.

In summary, while the Pixel 10 pre-order offers are tempting, they come with specific conditions that require careful consideration. By being informed and thoughtful about your purchase, you can enjoy the benefits without encountering any unexpected issues.

Belkin Unveils Qi2 Foldable Charger for Pixel 10 Series

Introducing Belkin’s 25W Qi2 Foldable Charger for the Google Pixel 10 Series

Belkin has introduced a new charging solution that is specifically designed to complement the latest Google Pixel 10 smartphone series. This charger is not just another wireless charging pad—it’s a versatile, foldable 2-in-1 device that offers enhanced convenience and performance.

The charger, named the “UltraCharge” by Belkin, supports 25W Qi2 charging speeds. This means it can deliver full-speed wireless charging to the Pixel 10 Pro XL, making it an ideal choice for users who want to keep their devices powered up efficiently. While the other models in the Pixel 10 series are limited to a maximum of 15W wireless charging, they can still benefit from the charger’s capabilities, albeit at a slightly lower speed.

A Versatile Design with Multiple Uses

One of the standout features of this charger is its foldable design. When unfolded, it reveals a standard Qi charging pad that can be used to charge a variety of devices. The second charging surface is particularly useful for charging Pixel Buds or other earbuds that support Qi wireless charging technology. This makes the charger a practical addition for users who own multiple wireless accessories.

For those who also own a Pixel Watch 4, the charger includes an additional feature. On the side of the charger, there is a USB-C port that allows users to connect their Pixel Watch 4 charging cable directly. This provides a convenient way to charge the watch alongside the smartphone, without the need for extra cables or adapters.

Advanced Cooling Technology for Safer Charging

Belkin has incorporated its proprietary ChillBoost technology into this charger to ensure that devices remain cool during the charging process. This is especially important for high-power wireless charging, as excessive heat can potentially damage devices or reduce battery life over time. By keeping temperatures under control, ChillBoost helps maintain the longevity and performance of connected devices.

In addition to the charger itself, Belkin includes a USB-C cable and a 45W power adapter in the box. These accessories ensure that users have everything they need to start using the charger right out of the box.

Availability and Pricing

The Belkin 25W Qi2 charger is already available for purchase in the United States through Belkin’s official website and Amazon. It is also accessible in parts of Europe via Amazon. The charger comes in three color options: Black, Blue, and White. Its compact, foldable design makes it easy to store and transport, adding to its appeal for on-the-go users.

Pricing for the charger is set at $59.99 in the US. For those interested in purchasing, links to the official retailers are provided below.

Where to Buy

• Buy the Belkin 25W Qi2 charger (Amazon)
• Buy the Belkin 25W Qi2 charger (Belkin)