Top 5 Switch 2 Cases Tested – The Winner Revealed

The Best Switch 2 Case I've Tried

Since the release of the Switch 2, I’ve tested a wide range of cases. From the smart but bulky charging case from Belkin to the nearly great felt Sleeper Case from Genki, an incredibly slim and simple one from TomToc, and even the official Nintendo case, each has had its own unique strengths. However, as I settle into long-term use with the console, it's time to choose which case I'll rely on daily.

The winner surprised me at first, but after several weeks of testing, especially with a small design flaw now fixed, it became clear that Dbrand’s Killswitch system is the standout choice.

What Makes the Killswitch Unique

The Killswitch isn’t just a typical case; it's a protective shell that can be applied to different parts of the Switch 2. At its core is a pair of Joy-Con protectors that your controllers clip into, along with a sleeve for the middle portion of the console. This setup makes the Switch 2 slightly bulkier, but significantly more ergonomic in handheld mode.

When you're ready to store or travel with your console, you can simply attach a frosted plastic cover that securely wraps around the Switch 2 using an elastic strap. This cover also includes a magnetically attached cart holder that can hold up to ten spare games.

If you plan to dock your Switch 2, the sleeve may make it too thick to fit into the standard dock. To address this, Dbrand provides a docking attachment that slots into the dock and allows you to attach the console externally. While not the most elegant solution, it works effectively.

Addressing Initial Issues

When the Killswitch first launched, some users reported two main issues. First, when holding the console with one hand in portable mode, the Switch 2’s controller could detach more easily than without the case, posing a risk of dropping. Second, the initial docking attachment wasn't smooth to use and required more effort to dock or undock the console with one hand.

Dbrand has since addressed these problems. They sent a supplementary kit to all existing customers, including friction pads to improve the grip of the docking attachment and redesigned Joy-Con grips that offer a better magnetic connection to the main body of the console. These updates have largely resolved the issues.

My Personal Experience

I haven’t used the docking attachment much because I almost always play the Switch 2 in handheld mode. For me, removing the sleeve when I want to dock the console is easier and saves space next to my TV. I didn’t have any issues with the original Joy-Con grips, but the revised versions are a welcome improvement for long-term use.

Despite the initial hiccups, I appreciate how Dbrand has worked to fix the problems. However, what truly convinced me was the comfort the Killswitch provides. While I never found the Switch 2 uncomfortable, many people criticize its lack of ergonomics. The added grip and comfort from the Killswitch make a noticeable difference, and I’ve grown so used to it that playing without it feels odd.

Additional Features

I also enjoy the small control stick-caps included with the case, which make the control sticks more grippy. When I use the Switch 2 without the Killswitch, it feels less comfortable, and when I compare it to other cases, the added bulk isn’t a major issue when packing it away.

Overall, I’m very satisfied with the Killswitch system. It offers excellent protection and comfort, making it my top recommendation for Switch 2 owners. One thing to note is that shipping can be pricey if you’re not based in the US.

Top 5 Switch 2 Cases Tested – The Winner Revealed

The Best Switch 2 Case I've Tried

Since the release of the Switch 2, I’ve tested a wide range of cases. From the smart but bulky charging case from Belkin to the nearly great felt Sleeper Case from Genki, an incredibly slim and simple one from TomToc, and even the official Nintendo case, each has had its own unique strengths. However, as I settle into long-term use with the console, it's time to choose which case I'll rely on daily.

The winner surprised me at first, but after several weeks of testing, especially with a small design flaw now fixed, it became clear that Dbrand’s Killswitch system is the standout choice.

What Makes the Killswitch Unique

The Killswitch isn’t just a typical case; it's a protective shell that can be applied to different parts of the Switch 2. At its core is a pair of Joy-Con protectors that your controllers clip into, along with a sleeve for the middle portion of the console. This setup makes the Switch 2 slightly bulkier, but significantly more ergonomic in handheld mode.

When you're ready to store or travel with your console, you can simply attach a frosted plastic cover that securely wraps around the Switch 2 using an elastic strap. This cover also includes a magnetically attached cart holder that can hold up to ten spare games.

If you plan to dock your Switch 2, the sleeve may make it too thick to fit into the standard dock. To address this, Dbrand provides a docking attachment that slots into the dock and allows you to attach the console externally. While not the most elegant solution, it works effectively.

Addressing Initial Issues

When the Killswitch first launched, some users reported two main issues. First, when holding the console with one hand in portable mode, the Switch 2’s controller could detach more easily than without the case, posing a risk of dropping. Second, the initial docking attachment wasn't smooth to use and required more effort to dock or undock the console with one hand.

Dbrand has since addressed these problems. They sent a supplementary kit to all existing customers, including friction pads to improve the grip of the docking attachment and redesigned Joy-Con grips that offer a better magnetic connection to the main body of the console. These updates have largely resolved the issues.

My Personal Experience

I haven’t used the docking attachment much because I almost always play the Switch 2 in handheld mode. For me, removing the sleeve when I want to dock the console is easier and saves space next to my TV. I didn’t have any issues with the original Joy-Con grips, but the revised versions are a welcome improvement for long-term use.

Despite the initial hiccups, I appreciate how Dbrand has worked to fix the problems. However, what truly convinced me was the comfort the Killswitch provides. While I never found the Switch 2 uncomfortable, many people criticize its lack of ergonomics. The added grip and comfort from the Killswitch make a noticeable difference, and I’ve grown so used to it that playing without it feels odd.

Additional Features

I also enjoy the small control stick-caps included with the case, which make the control sticks more grippy. When I use the Switch 2 without the Killswitch, it feels less comfortable, and when I compare it to other cases, the added bulk isn’t a major issue when packing it away.

Overall, I’m very satisfied with the Killswitch system. It offers excellent protection and comfort, making it my top recommendation for Switch 2 owners. One thing to note is that shipping can be pricey if you’re not based in the US.

AGI Talk Shakes Silicon Valley, But Fears Linger About Superpowered AI

The Rise and Fall of AGI Hype

Once upon a time, Silicon Valley was captivated by the promise of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). In early 2024, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman confidently stated that his company had “AGI achieved internally.” This came after he previously claimed that AGI might be realized in 2025. His team even adopted the nickname “AGI Sherpas,” while former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever led researchers in chants of “Feel the AGI!” Microsoft, a major backer of OpenAI, published a paper in 2024 suggesting that GPT-4 exhibited “sparks of AGI.” Elon Musk founded xAI with the goal of building AGI, predicting it could arrive as early as 2025 or 2026. Demis Hassabis of DeepMind also claimed the world was “on the cusp” of AGI.

Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, pledged to develop “full general intelligence” for future products. Dario Amodei of Anthropic, though skeptical of the term AGI, suggested powerful AI could emerge by 2027. Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, predicted AGI would arrive within three to five years. However, the enthusiasm surrounding AGI has since waned, with a noticeable shift toward pragmatism over utopian visions.

A Shift in Focus

The AGI fever is now fading, marking a significant change in tone among tech leaders. At a CNBC appearance this summer, Altman dismissed AGI as “not a super-useful term.” In the New York Times, Schmidt urged Silicon Valley to focus on practical technology rather than chasing superhuman AI. AI pioneer Andrew Ng and U.S. AI czar David Sacks both called AGI “overhyped.”

The confusion around what AGI actually means contributes to its growing skepticism. While most agree that AGI stands for “artificial general intelligence,” definitions vary widely. Some see it as AI rivaling human brain complexity, while others define it as systems capable of performing any cognitive task a competent human can. OpenAI’s definition emphasizes autonomous systems that can outperform humans at economically valuable work.

The Reality of AGI

Despite the hype, progress in AI development has not met expectations. The rollout of OpenAI’s GPT-5 model in August 2024 was underwhelming, offering only incremental improvements rather than the breakthrough many anticipated. Shane Legg, who helped coin the term AGI, noted that GPT-5 lacks real understanding, continuous learning, and grounded experience.

Altman’s retreat from AGI language is particularly notable given the company’s founding mission. OpenAI was built on AGI hype, raising billions in capital and forming a partnership with Microsoft. A clause in their agreement restricts Microsoft’s access to future technology if OpenAI declares AGI achievement. Microsoft, having invested over $13 billion, reportedly wants to remove this clause and has even considered walking away from the deal.

A Healthy Vibe Shift

Many view the shift away from AGI rhetoric as a positive development. Shay Boloor, chief market strategist at Futurum Equities, called it “very healthy,” emphasizing that markets reward execution over vague narratives. Others argue that the focus is moving from a monolithic AGI fantasy to domain-specific “superintelligences.”

Daniel Saks of Landbase believes the future lies in decentralized, domain-specific models achieving superhuman performance in particular fields. Christopher Symons of Lirio argues that the AGI term is unhelpful, as it diverts resources from more concrete applications where AI can benefit society immediately.

Continued Debate and Concerns

While the AGI narrative is less prominent, the mission and phrase haven’t disappeared entirely. Executives at Anthropic and DeepMind still refer to themselves as “AGI-pilled,” though the term is debated. Some see it as belief in AGI’s imminent arrival, while others view it as the ongoing improvement of AI models.

Some critics argue that the hedging around AGI is concerning. Former OpenAI researcher Steven Adler warned that some companies aim to build systems smarter than humans, calling for serious attention to the risks. Max Tegmark of the Future of Life Institute accuses AI leaders of changing their tune to avoid regulation, comparing it to a cocaine salesman downplaying the drug’s effects.

The Future of AI

Whether referred to as AGI or another term, the hype may fade, but the real questions about AI’s trajectory remain. With so much at stake—money, jobs, security, and safety—the conversation about where this race leads is far from over.

AGI Talk Shakes Silicon Valley, But Fears Linger About Superpowered AI

The Rise and Fall of AGI Hype

Once upon a time, Silicon Valley was captivated by the promise of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). In early 2024, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman confidently stated that his company had “AGI achieved internally.” This came after he previously claimed that AGI might be realized in 2025. His team even adopted the nickname “AGI Sherpas,” while former chief scientist Ilya Sutskever led researchers in chants of “Feel the AGI!” Microsoft, a major backer of OpenAI, published a paper in 2024 suggesting that GPT-4 exhibited “sparks of AGI.” Elon Musk founded xAI with the goal of building AGI, predicting it could arrive as early as 2025 or 2026. Demis Hassabis of DeepMind also claimed the world was “on the cusp” of AGI.

Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, pledged to develop “full general intelligence” for future products. Dario Amodei of Anthropic, though skeptical of the term AGI, suggested powerful AI could emerge by 2027. Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, predicted AGI would arrive within three to five years. However, the enthusiasm surrounding AGI has since waned, with a noticeable shift toward pragmatism over utopian visions.

A Shift in Focus

The AGI fever is now fading, marking a significant change in tone among tech leaders. At a CNBC appearance this summer, Altman dismissed AGI as “not a super-useful term.” In the New York Times, Schmidt urged Silicon Valley to focus on practical technology rather than chasing superhuman AI. AI pioneer Andrew Ng and U.S. AI czar David Sacks both called AGI “overhyped.”

The confusion around what AGI actually means contributes to its growing skepticism. While most agree that AGI stands for “artificial general intelligence,” definitions vary widely. Some see it as AI rivaling human brain complexity, while others define it as systems capable of performing any cognitive task a competent human can. OpenAI’s definition emphasizes autonomous systems that can outperform humans at economically valuable work.

The Reality of AGI

Despite the hype, progress in AI development has not met expectations. The rollout of OpenAI’s GPT-5 model in August 2024 was underwhelming, offering only incremental improvements rather than the breakthrough many anticipated. Shane Legg, who helped coin the term AGI, noted that GPT-5 lacks real understanding, continuous learning, and grounded experience.

Altman’s retreat from AGI language is particularly notable given the company’s founding mission. OpenAI was built on AGI hype, raising billions in capital and forming a partnership with Microsoft. A clause in their agreement restricts Microsoft’s access to future technology if OpenAI declares AGI achievement. Microsoft, having invested over $13 billion, reportedly wants to remove this clause and has even considered walking away from the deal.

A Healthy Vibe Shift

Many view the shift away from AGI rhetoric as a positive development. Shay Boloor, chief market strategist at Futurum Equities, called it “very healthy,” emphasizing that markets reward execution over vague narratives. Others argue that the focus is moving from a monolithic AGI fantasy to domain-specific “superintelligences.”

Daniel Saks of Landbase believes the future lies in decentralized, domain-specific models achieving superhuman performance in particular fields. Christopher Symons of Lirio argues that the AGI term is unhelpful, as it diverts resources from more concrete applications where AI can benefit society immediately.

Continued Debate and Concerns

While the AGI narrative is less prominent, the mission and phrase haven’t disappeared entirely. Executives at Anthropic and DeepMind still refer to themselves as “AGI-pilled,” though the term is debated. Some see it as belief in AGI’s imminent arrival, while others view it as the ongoing improvement of AI models.

Some critics argue that the hedging around AGI is concerning. Former OpenAI researcher Steven Adler warned that some companies aim to build systems smarter than humans, calling for serious attention to the risks. Max Tegmark of the Future of Life Institute accuses AI leaders of changing their tune to avoid regulation, comparing it to a cocaine salesman downplaying the drug’s effects.

The Future of AI

Whether referred to as AGI or another term, the hype may fade, but the real questions about AI’s trajectory remain. With so much at stake—money, jobs, security, and safety—the conversation about where this race leads is far from over.

The Rise of the Meat Bags

The Human Response to the AI Revolution

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into our digital lives, a growing number of individuals and groups are seeking ways to push back against its dominance. This movement is not about rejecting technology entirely but rather about finding strategies to preserve human agency, creativity, and authenticity in an AI-driven world.

Cool AI's Jets

The rapid development of generative AI, including models like ChatGPT, has sparked a global race among tech companies. However, this pace of innovation was once tempered by a more cautious approach. In the past, startups and tech giants prioritized careful deployment of AI to mitigate potential harms. That changed with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, which ignited a frenzy in the AI space. A 2023 proposal for a six-month pause in AI development to address existential risks received little real support, but some critics still hope for regulatory intervention or market shifts that could slow things down.

The "slow AI" movement, led by high-profile critics and ethics-focused designers, is one such response. It calls for a more deliberate approach to AI development, emphasizing long-term societal benefits over short-term gains.

Slow Ourselves Down

One of the core challenges of AI is its ability to speed up tasks, often at the expense of meaningful engagement. For those who value deep thinking and human connection, AI can feel overwhelming. Some individuals are turning to the "slow web" movement, which emphasizes quality over quantity. Instead of scrolling endlessly through social media, they are reading longer articles, engaging in physical activity, and taking time for rest.

Artists and writers like Jenny Odell and Kristoffer Tjalve have become inspirations for this approach. Their work encourages people to disconnect from the constant noise of digital life and focus on what truly matters.

Embrace Human-Made Media

The media landscape is also evolving in response to AI. As chatbots begin to dominate online content, there is a renewed emphasis on human voices. Email newsletters, podcasts, and independent publications are gaining traction as alternatives to AI-generated content. These platforms highlight the value of imperfection and personal insight.

Websites like Reddit and Wikipedia are also positioning themselves as bastions of human interaction. Reddit promotes itself as "the human internet," while Wikipedia relies on a meticulous process of human review to maintain its neutrality. In the age of AI, authenticity is becoming more important than ever, with many users now viewing AI-generated content as "slop."

Get "Spiky"

In a world dominated by AI, standing out requires a unique perspective. The concept of being "spiky" — acting unpredictably and choosing paths that deviate from AI's expected patterns — is gaining popularity. Students at AI-focused schools are embracing this idea, seeing it as essential for remaining relevant in an AI-driven future.

However, the term "spiky" can be ambiguous. While it may encourage originality and creativity, it can also lead to anti-social behavior or destructive actions. This duality highlights the need for thoughtful application of the concept.

Stay Offline

Another strategy for resisting AI's influence is to stay offline. Every human action, no matter how small, can become training data for AI models, leading to cycles of increasing weirdness in AI outputs. To avoid this, some creators are choosing to keep their ideas completely off the digital grid.

Robin Sloan, a well-known author and technologist, has been experimenting with AI for years but has recently shifted toward publishing his work in printed zines without online versions. His "Secret Playbook" offers advice for creators looking to counter AI's influence, including being stubborn and having fun — qualities that AI models cannot replicate.

The Bottom Line

While some view AI as a path to a utopian future, others see it as a threat to human values. The pushback against AI is not just about resistance but about finding ways to coexist with technology while preserving what makes us human. Whether through slowing down, embracing human-made media, or staying offline, these strategies offer a range of approaches for navigating the AI era.

The Rise of the Meat Bags

The Human Response to the AI Revolution

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into our digital lives, a growing number of individuals and groups are seeking ways to push back against its dominance. This movement is not about rejecting technology entirely but rather about finding strategies to preserve human agency, creativity, and authenticity in an AI-driven world.

Cool AI's Jets

The rapid development of generative AI, including models like ChatGPT, has sparked a global race among tech companies. However, this pace of innovation was once tempered by a more cautious approach. In the past, startups and tech giants prioritized careful deployment of AI to mitigate potential harms. That changed with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, which ignited a frenzy in the AI space. A 2023 proposal for a six-month pause in AI development to address existential risks received little real support, but some critics still hope for regulatory intervention or market shifts that could slow things down.

The "slow AI" movement, led by high-profile critics and ethics-focused designers, is one such response. It calls for a more deliberate approach to AI development, emphasizing long-term societal benefits over short-term gains.

Slow Ourselves Down

One of the core challenges of AI is its ability to speed up tasks, often at the expense of meaningful engagement. For those who value deep thinking and human connection, AI can feel overwhelming. Some individuals are turning to the "slow web" movement, which emphasizes quality over quantity. Instead of scrolling endlessly through social media, they are reading longer articles, engaging in physical activity, and taking time for rest.

Artists and writers like Jenny Odell and Kristoffer Tjalve have become inspirations for this approach. Their work encourages people to disconnect from the constant noise of digital life and focus on what truly matters.

Embrace Human-Made Media

The media landscape is also evolving in response to AI. As chatbots begin to dominate online content, there is a renewed emphasis on human voices. Email newsletters, podcasts, and independent publications are gaining traction as alternatives to AI-generated content. These platforms highlight the value of imperfection and personal insight.

Websites like Reddit and Wikipedia are also positioning themselves as bastions of human interaction. Reddit promotes itself as "the human internet," while Wikipedia relies on a meticulous process of human review to maintain its neutrality. In the age of AI, authenticity is becoming more important than ever, with many users now viewing AI-generated content as "slop."

Get "Spiky"

In a world dominated by AI, standing out requires a unique perspective. The concept of being "spiky" — acting unpredictably and choosing paths that deviate from AI's expected patterns — is gaining popularity. Students at AI-focused schools are embracing this idea, seeing it as essential for remaining relevant in an AI-driven future.

However, the term "spiky" can be ambiguous. While it may encourage originality and creativity, it can also lead to anti-social behavior or destructive actions. This duality highlights the need for thoughtful application of the concept.

Stay Offline

Another strategy for resisting AI's influence is to stay offline. Every human action, no matter how small, can become training data for AI models, leading to cycles of increasing weirdness in AI outputs. To avoid this, some creators are choosing to keep their ideas completely off the digital grid.

Robin Sloan, a well-known author and technologist, has been experimenting with AI for years but has recently shifted toward publishing his work in printed zines without online versions. His "Secret Playbook" offers advice for creators looking to counter AI's influence, including being stubborn and having fun — qualities that AI models cannot replicate.

The Bottom Line

While some view AI as a path to a utopian future, others see it as a threat to human values. The pushback against AI is not just about resistance but about finding ways to coexist with technology while preserving what makes us human. Whether through slowing down, embracing human-made media, or staying offline, these strategies offer a range of approaches for navigating the AI era.

Folding Hand Truck: A Household Essential for Just $35 at Walmart

A Practical Solution for Moving and Organizing

When it comes to moving or rearranging items within your home, having the right tools can make all the difference. One such tool that stands out is the Tntants Folding Hand Truck. Designed with both functionality and convenience in mind, this hand truck is a valuable addition to any household.

The Tntants Folding Hand Truck is currently available at a discounted price, making it an even more appealing choice for those looking to streamline their moving or organizing tasks. Originally priced at $70, it’s now available for just $35 at Walmart. This significant discount has caught the attention of many shoppers who have praised its performance and value.

Features That Make It Stand Out

Despite its compact size, the Tntants Folding Hand Truck is built to handle heavy loads. Weighing only about 8 pounds, it is surprisingly lightweight yet robust enough to carry up to 500 pounds. The platform measures approximately 17 inches long and 12.5 inches wide, but it can expand to a maximum length of 22 inches, offering greater flexibility for different tasks.

One of the standout features of this hand truck is its six-wheel design. Four of these wheels are capable of rotating 360 degrees, allowing for smooth and easy maneuverability. Whether you're navigating tight spaces or moving large items, the wheels provide excellent control and stability.

The hand truck also includes a durable stainless steel telescopic handle that can be adjusted to suit individual preferences. The handle can be extended from 14.4 inches to 33.7 inches in height, making it comfortable for users of various heights.

To ensure that heavy items remain secure during transport, the hand truck comes equipped with three elastic ropes featuring hooks. These ropes help keep your load in place, adding an extra layer of safety and convenience.

User Feedback and Satisfaction

Shoppers who have purchased the Tntants Folding Hand Truck have shared positive experiences, highlighting its quality and versatility. One reviewer noted, “It has exceeded my expectations. It’s very well-built and strong enough to carry heavy boxes, luggage, and even small furniture pieces without any problems.” They also appreciated how the hand truck folds down, making it easy to store in a car trunk or a small space.

Another user shared, “Whether I’m moving heavy plant pots, hauling groceries from the car to the house, or even shifting furniture and boxes around, this hand truck handles it all with ease.” They praised the six wheels for their smooth maneuverability and the folding design for its convenience when not in use.

A third reviewer stated, “This cart is much more solid than I expected. The handle is easy to use, and the wheels operate well. It’s also easy to carry when not in use. I’m completely satisfied.”

Why Invest in This Hand Truck?

With a 50% discount available for a limited time, the Tntants Folding Hand Truck offers an excellent opportunity to upgrade your moving and organizing tools. Its combination of durability, ease of use, and convenient storage makes it a practical investment for any home.

Whether you're preparing for a move, tackling daily chores, or simply looking for a reliable way to transport items around your house, this hand truck is designed to meet your needs. Don’t miss out on this great deal — consider adding the Tntants Folding Hand Truck to your collection today.